Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2324 (AP)

SHAIK REENA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/689/2025 · 2025-01-10

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010001392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 689/2025 Between: Shaik Reena and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V L MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natur guaranteed under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners promotion to the post of School Assistant Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu with all consequential IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 689/2025 ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for the promotion to the post of School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natur 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners promotion to the post of School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu with all consequential benefits and pass….” IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3310] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the case of the petitioner for the promotion to the post of School Assistant Urdu/Telugu from Language Pandit Urdu/Telugu even though a post was reserved for the petitioner is highly illegal arbitrary unjust improper and in violation of principles of natural justice 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Urdu/Telugu from 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has furnished a copy of Proceedings of the District Educational Officer, SPSR Nellore District vide R.C.No.5776/B2/2024, dated 04.01.2025 along with Promotion-Annexure, wherein at Sl.No.1 and Sl.No.4, the petitioners herein are promoted. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed by the respondents No.1 and 4 and no further orders are required for adjudication in the present writ petition and hence the same may be closed. 3. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents does not refute the said submission. 4. Recording the above submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date : 10-01-2025 Gvl HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION No: 689/2025 Date :10.01.2025 Gvl