1 APHC010327542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 17062/2025 Between: 1. KATTA VIJAYA, W/O. K. RAVI, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O. NELLALURU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VALAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CHEEKAVOLU GRAM PANCHAYAT SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL, SPDCL OFFICE, SYDAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE LINEMAN, SPDCL OFFICE, SYDAPURAM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 8. SMT JANA RAJESWARI, W/O. VENKATA RAMANAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. ANNAMRAJUPALLE, SYDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K A NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Karra Madhavi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K.A.Narasimham, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri P. Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2, Sri D. Venkata Rao, learned Counsel representing Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL appearing for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7 and Sri T. Anvesh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudhir, learned Standing Counsel for the Gram Panchayat appearing for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5. 2. It transpires from the record that the sister of the Writ Petitioner herein is arrayed as Unofficial Respondent No.8. It is the submission of the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner that the Possession Certificate was issued in the name of husband of the Unofficial Respondent No.8 (who is now no more). Consequent upon issuance of Possession Certificate by the Revenue Department, the electric connection was also obtained in the name of the husband of the Unofficial Respondent No.8 (Venkata Ramanaiah). The present Writ Petition is filed against the Panchayat Secretary as well as the 3 Electric Department by the Writ Petitioner seeking, cancellation of the Possession Certificate granted in favour of Sri Venkata Ramanaiah (husband of Unofficial Respondent No.8) and to be issued in the name of the Writ Petitioner on the strength of the ‘Registered Will’ executed by the mother of the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent No.8. 3. These facts would indicate that the dispute is purely private in nature, subsisting between the Writ Petitioner and her sister (Unofficial Respondent No.8). In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is not maintainable. Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. 4. The Writ Petitioner is, however, at liberty to avail other remedies as available to her under law. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 11.07.2025 Vns