Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23233 (RAJ)

RAGINEE CHAUHAN@RUKAYYA AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLW/260/2015 · 2025-01-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:209] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 260/2015 1. Raginee Chauhan @ Rukayya Khan D/o Shri Shiv Charan Chauhan, W/o Maruf Ahamad, aged 27 years, Resident of 15, New Mahadev Nagar, Ram Nagar Vistar, Swej Farm, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.) At present R/o Plot No. F-5, Jamna Lal Bajaj Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Maruf Ahamad Son of Shri Ashfaq Ahamad, aged 22 years, Resident of Plot No. F-5, Jamna Lal Bajaj Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs & Justice, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. The Commissioner of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. S.H.O. Police Station Mahesh Nagar, jaipur (Raj.) 5. S.H.O. Police Station Ashok Nagar, jaipur (Raj.) 6. Shri Shiv Charan Chauhan Son of Shri Bhonri Lal Chauhan, Resident of 15, New Mahadev Nagar, Ram Nagar Vistar, Swej Farm, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/01/2025 1. By way of filing of this petition, the petitioners are seeking directions against the State-respondents for providing protection from the private respondent. 2. The instant petition was preferred way back in the year 2015, thereafter, more than nine years have passed, [2025:RJ-JP:209] (2 of 2) [CRLW-260/2015] now the apprehension of danger is not there, hence, under these circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. The criminal writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/310