RAM BHAJAN THAKUR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/10445/2025 · 2025-05-19
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23231 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23231 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19.05.2025
Ct. No. 30
S.L No.15 SM
WPA 10445 of 2025
Sri Ram Bhajan Thakur
Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bikash Shaw Mr. Sk. Saad Islam
……for the petitioner Ms. Amrita Pandey Mr. Supratim Ghosh
……for the respondent
Mr. Ranjan Saha Mr. Subhadeep Maitra
……for the State
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
The present writ application has been preferred praying for direction upon the Controlling Authority where the prayer of the petitioner is pending since
04.06.2016.
It is further submitted that during pendency of the proceedings before the Controlling Authority the workman expired.
The petitioner has also made an application for substitution which is at page 33 being Annexure P6.
It is stated that in spite of such application, no action has been taken by the Controlling Authority, Chandernagore, Hooghly till date.
Considering the materials on record, the conduct of the Controlling Authority, Chandernagore, Hooghly appears to be very negligent and as such the
2 notice of the Labour Commissioner, West Bengal is brought to the present case.
It is thus directed that the Labour Commissioner, West Bengal shall ensure that the Controlling Authority acts in accordance with law expeditiously in all cases. The conduct of such officers is to be regularly monitored and supervised by the senior/superior officers and above all the Labour Commissioner.
Accordingly, the Controlling Authority, Chandernagore, Hooghly is directed to complete the proceedings within 30 days from the date of communication of this order.
Parties to act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Hon'ble High Court.
Let a copy be served upon the Labour Commissioner, Government of West Bengal for compliance.
The writ application stands disposed of.
Be it noted that this Court has not gone into the merit of the case and the Controlling Authority shall decide the case in accordance with law, on the basis of materials on record.
3
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
[Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]