Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23230 (GAU)

SHRI. SAZUBO@POUCHUNWI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/152/2023 · 2025-08-18

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020003692023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/152/2023 SHRI. SAZUBO@POUCHUNWI AND ANR W/C LABOUR (FIXED) PEREN DIVISION, PEREN NAGALAND 2: SHRI. SAUBO@CHERAKUNGBO W/C LABOUR (FIXED) PEREN DIVISION NAGALAN VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALANDY P AND AR DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND WORKS AND HOUSING NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD(H) DIVISION NO.1 KOHIMA NAGALAND 7:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER PEREN NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : KEKHRIESENUO, H ZELIANG Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 19.08.2025 1. Heard Ms. H. Zeliang, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S. Chang, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. The prayer is not opposed to by the learned Government Advocate. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, the prayer is allowed. 5. This writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant