Gadde Srihari Babu v. The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
WP/30419/2010 · 2025-08-10
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2323 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2323 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010001362010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30419/2010 Between:
1. GADDE SRIHARI BABU, S/O. GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY PROPRIETOR M/S. BHAVANI GAS CO., VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, REP. BY ITS TERRITORY MANAGER LPG., VIJAYAWADA.
2. ADDANKI KISHORE, PROPRIETOR GAYATRI GAS CO., KHAMMAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, or order or direction, declaring : (a) that the action of the 1st Respondent in not entrusting or allotting new LPG Connections to the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal and as unjust, (b) that the Notice of the 1st Respondent dated 18/11/2010 bearing Ref. No. VJA/LPG/Bhavani Gas Co./ as arbitrary, illegal as unjust, and as having been vitiated by principles of natural justice, and issue a consequential direction directing the 1st Respondent not to take any action against the petitioner pursuant to the notice dated 18/11/2010 bearing Ref. VJA/LPG/Bhavani Gas Co./ IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 38737 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the notice dated 18/11/2010 bearing Ref. VJA/LPG/Bhavani Gas Co. issued by the 1st Respondent, pending disposal of above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SINDHU KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.08.2025 SR
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 30419/2010
Date: 11.08.2025
SR