IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1803 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar …….Petitioner Versus HP State Forest Corporation & Anr. … Respondent s Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 23.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Divisional Manager, Himkashth Sale Depot, Dhanotu, Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, learned counsel for the respondents, fairly states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid office order, which is taken on record, this Court finds that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, petitioner herein has been granted work charge status. Above named counsel states that order of pay fixation shall be issued expeditiously. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure that order of pay fixation, if not already issued, shall be issued to the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within ten days from today. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 17, 2025 (sunil)