Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23226 (MAD)

R.Saikumar v. R.Ravinder

A/901/2025 · 2025-04-09

C Saravanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Application No.901 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.04.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Application No.901 of 2025 in TOS.No.18 of 2008 R.Saikumar ... Applicant Vs. 1.R.Ravinder 2.D.Dhanush 3.R.Durga 4.R.Prabakar 5.S.Kalpana 6.A.Chamundeeswari ... Respondents Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VI Rule 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to strike off Exhibit-Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2002, marked through PW-2 on 03.02.2025 in TOS.No.18 of 2008 before the Additional Master-I. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Application No.901 of 2025 For Applicant : Mr.Francis Cedric D Cruz for Mr.P.B.Ramanujam For Respondents : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar for Mr.Rahul Balaji ORDER This Application has been filed by the applicant / 2nd defendant to strike off Exhibit-Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2002 which was marked through PW-2 on 03.02.2025 in TOS.No.18 of 2008 before the Additional Master-I. 2. PW-2 is son of the 1st attesting witness PW-1, who has since deceased. Therefore, to corroborate the signature in the Will dated 25.02.1999 which is said to have been executed by the testator namely Rachaveti Soundari @ Jayalakshmi, the son of the 1st attesting witness PW-1 was examined as PW2 in whose presence Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2002 was executed by the 1st attesting witness PW-1 namely Kanniah Naidu was marked. This was marked in presence of the counsels. 3. Merely marking a document as an Exhibit in Court does not ipso facto make it admissible as evidence. The Court still needs to determine the document's proof, relevancy and admissibility based on well-settled legal principles and rules of evidence. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Application No.901 of 2025 4. Therefore, Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2022, marked through PW2 on 03.02.2025 cannot be struck off the records of the above suit. Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2022 can be said to have been marked subject to its proof, relevancy and admissibility. It is open for the applicant / 2nd defendant to raise all such defense that are known under law to Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2022 at the time of final hearing. 5. Therefore, this Application filed to strike off Exhibit-Ex-P8 Will dated 24.05.2002 which was marked through PW-2 on 03.02.2025 through PW1 namely Kanniah Naidu is dismissed. 6. Considering the fact that the trial is yet to complete, Registry is directed to list this case before the Additional Master-II for continuation of trial on 09.06.2025. 09.04.2025 arb 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Application No.901 of 2025 C.SARAVANAN, J. arb Application No.901 of 2025 09.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis