[2025:RJ-JP:37056] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 247/2012 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8501/2009 Managing Committee Sanatan Dharam Prakashak Uchh Prathamik Vidyalaya, Beawar, Ajmer (Raj.) through its Secretary. ----Petitioner-Applicants Versus 1.Bhaskar Samant Secretary, Primary and Secondary Education, State of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Alok Gupta- Director Primary Education, Bikaner (Raj.) ….Non Petitioners-Contemnors 3. Babulal Bhutada, S/o Shri Chhagan Lal Bhutada, aged about 65 years R/o College Road, Sankhla Colony House No.82, Beawar, Ajmer (Raj.) 4. Anand Swaroop Heda, S/o Shri Ramswaroop Heda, aged about 60 years, R/o Guru Kripa Godavari, School Marg, Beawar, District Ajmer. ----Pro-Forma Non petitioners For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devashish Pancholi for Mr. Rajat Ranjan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Natuka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 11/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 23.05.2011. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have not complied with the impugned order. 3. Mr. S.S. Naruka, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submits that they have complied [2025:RJ-JP:37056] (2 of 2) [CCP-247/2012] with the order by issuing the order dated 24.08.2023, whereby the representation of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 5. Vide order dated 23.05.2011, the petitioner was directed to make a representation to government and on receiving such representation, the respondents authorities were to decide the representation within a period of three months from the date of its making. 6. Vide order dated 24.08.2023, which has been placed on record by the respondents as compliance report, Annexure- CR/6, the representation submitted by the petitioner in view of the liberty given in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8501/2009, the respondents have decided the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order. 7. In view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has been decided, this Court is of the opinion that the respondents have made substantial compliance of the direction of the Court, hence, the present contempt petition is disposed of. 8. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to him under law so as to challenge the order dated 24.08.2023, if he has any grievance. 9. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /60