Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23213 (PAT)

Shivam Gupta @ Shivam Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./14984/2025 · 2025-04-07

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14984 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-559 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Shivam Gupta @ Shivam Kumar Gupta S/o- Late Dilip Prasad Resident of village- Bara Telpa wardd no 42 PS-town District- Chapra 2. Sanjay Gupta S/o- Vanshi Prasad Resident of village- Bara Telpa wardd no 42 PS-town District- Chapra 3. Kishan Gupta @ Kishan Kumar S/o- Late Dilip Prasad Resident of village- Bara Telpa wardd no 42 PS-town District- Chapra 4. Bulbul Gupta @ Amit Gupta @ Bulbul S/o- Dhrup Prasad Resident of village- Bara Telpa wardd no 42 PS-town District- Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Adarsh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The prosecution case in brief is that the petitioners are alleged to have abused and assaulted informant with iron rod and also snatched cash and jewellery. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Case and counter case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14984 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/2 between the parties. As per injury report, doctor has found the injury simple in nature. There is delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. Considering the general and omnibus allegation and nature of injury, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners are allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest /surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of C.J.M., Saran in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 559 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S. Ranjeet/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T