Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23212 (KAR)

SMT S MAHALAKSHMI v. THE TERRITORY MANAGER-RETAIL

WP/9574/2020 · 2025-06-10

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19668 WP No. 9574 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.9574 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. S. MAHALAKSHMI W/O GOVIND RAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.6, BYRESHNAGAR NILAYA, OPP. GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 036. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAKSHMANA.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TERRITORY MANAGER- RETAIL, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, DUPARC TRINITY, 7TH FLOOR, NO.7, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. BHARAT BHAVAN, NO 4 AND 6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, MUMBAI- 400 001. 3. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY , MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19668 WP No. 9574 of 2020 SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M N KUMAR CGSC FOR R3; SRI. KUMAR N J FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 01.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-N DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 13.09.2019 OFFERING ALTERNATE LAND VIDE ANNEXURE-K AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 02.06.2025 none appears for the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31