IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CrMMO No. 804 of 2025 Date of Decision : 27.08.2025 Sukhbir Kaur ....Petitioner Versus State of HP and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No For the petitioner : M/s Kshitiz Goel and Krishan Kanha, Advocates. For respondents No. 1 to 3/ State : Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Ms. Sunaina, Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 / State. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 In view of above the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 27th August, 2025 (Anurag)