IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1885 of 2025 Date of decision : 23.9.2025. Devi Ram ...Petitioner. Versus HP State Forest Corporation & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit, Advocate, vice Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Notice. Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with. 3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh in case the relief sought is not completely granted. 4. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 23rd September, 2025. Judge (kck) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2-