Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2321 (RAJ)

SATISH MEENA SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/2/2025 · 2025-01-20

Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2581-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 2/2025 Satish Meena Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Mundiyawas, Post Bhangdoli, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) 4. S.h.o. Police Station Thanagazi, Dikstrict Alwar (Rajasthan) 5. S.h.o. Police Station Akbarpur, District Alwar (Raj.) 6. Rohitash Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Badri Prasad Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Kundalka, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Suman Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) For State : : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.GA, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. GA Mr. Umashankar, Thanagazi, District Alwar Ms. Hemlata, SI, SHO, Akbarpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 20/01/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred this habeas corpus petition seeking production of the corpus who is stated to be wife of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:2581-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-2/2025] 2. Corpus has been produced before the Court by Mr. Umashankar, Thanagazi, District Alwar and by Ms. Hemlata, SI, SHO, Akbarpur. 3. We have interacted with the corpus. Corpus is a major and has stated before the Court that she does not wish to go with petitioner and that she is not in any illegal detention. 4. We have considered the contentions. 5. Taking note of the fact that corpus is a major and has stated before the Court that she is not in any illegal detention and does not wish to go with petitioner, we deem it proper to dismiss the habeas corpus petition. 6. Habeas corpus petition is accordingly, dismissed. Corpus being a major is free to go to the place of her choice. 7. Mr. Umashankar, Thanagazi, District Alwar and Ms. Hemlata, SI, SHO, Akbarpur is directed to safely escort the corpus to the place of her choice. 8. A copy of this order be provided to learned GA-cum- AAG for necessary compliance. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J CHANDAN /1