Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23206 (CHH)

M/S RAGHUVANSH CHANDRAKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3180/2021 · 2025-07-13

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32546 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3180 of 2021 1 - M/s Raghuvansh Chandrakar A Registered Partnership Firm Having Its Office At Village Beherabuda, Post Gutku, Nayapara District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh, Through Its Duly Authorised Partner, Raghuvansh Chandrakar, S/o Late Shri, Makhanlal Chandrakar, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Beherabuda, Post Gutku, Nayapara District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Joint Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development Indravati Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Municipal Corporation Durg Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Executive Engineer Municipal Corporation Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Ashish Surana, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy.G.A For Respondents No.3, to 5 : Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 14.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that the dispute involved in the present suit has already been settled between the parties and the document to establish this fact has been placed on record today itself. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 to 5 does not dispute this fact. 3. Taking into consideration the subsequent developments, the petition is disposed of as the dispute has already been settled between the parties. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi