IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No.122 of 2025 Decided on: 29th August, 2025 Bal Krishan and another .......Petitioners versus Shanti Swaroop and another ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. The prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 2. The certified copy of impugned order be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioners against submissions by him of a photocopy of the order to be placed on record. August 29, 2025 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.