IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Civil Revision No. 143 of 2024. Decided on: 03.09.2025 ____________________________________________________ M/s Aggrwal Agencies. ……….. petitioner Versus Vijay Kumar Sharma. ……….respondent ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondent : Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge ( oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that vacant possession of the premises in the case at hand have been handed over to the respondent on 12.08.2025, which fact is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that in view of the vacation of the premises, they will forego all their claims with respect to use and occupation charges in the case at hand. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances of the case, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. 3. Permission granted. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also, the pending application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge September 3, 2025 Susheel 2