TAKSEEM AKHTAR v. STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2103/2012 · 2025-08-11
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2320 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2320 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 17
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2103/2012
Takseem Akhtar
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
State of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
11.08.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and having regard to the relief sought, and the fact that scheme now stands closed, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul)
Judge
Jammu: 11.08.2025 Shafqat