IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18679 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.01.2026 _______________________________________________________ Karan Rajta …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge January 02,2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?