Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23190 (CHH)

LALLAN YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1677/2025 · 2025-06-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22859 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1677 of 2025 1 - Lallan Yadav S/o Lallu Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Iradatganj, Police Station Dhurpur, District Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Police Station Singhoda, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Ms. Shubha Shriwastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 23.07.2024 passed in MCRC No.4688 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Lallan Yadav, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Saraipali District- VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.16 12:13:18 +0530 2 Mahasamund (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 30.04.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in the present case, charges have been framed by the former presiding officer and at present statement of 06 prosecution witnesses have been recorded by the present Presiding Officer and 10 prosecution witnesses are remained to be examined. Considering the numbers of witnesses, the trial is likely to take some more time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of six months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali