Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23190 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIB/736/2025 · 2025-03-20

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41722 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 736 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Mr. Kailash Nath Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2 / Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Jaunpur to decide the Revision No. 2612 of 2023, Computerized Case No. 202354143600002612 (Mishrial Vs. Sochanram) under Section 48(1) of the UPCH Act, 1953 within stipulated period of time as directed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. This Court vide order dated 27.2.2025 directed the Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Jaunpur to submit report in the matter. 4. In compliance of the order of this Court, report/instruction dated 20.3.2025 sent by the Deputy Director of Consolidation is already on the record of the writ petition. 5. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the report/instruction dated 20.3.2025 submitted that pending revision under Section 48(1) of the UPCH Act has been decided vide order dated 20.3.2025 and order is annexed with the report/instruction dated 20.3.2025. 6. Considering the final order dated 20.3.2025 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Jaunpur, the instant petition has become infructuous 7. In view of the aforementioned fact, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 21.3.2025/S.K.S. Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad