201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8950-2024 Date of decision: 14.05.2025 VISHAL KANSAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Ishan Gupta, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, Asst. AG, Punjab. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate and Mr. Lakshay Goel, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed by the peoner for cancellaon of bail granted to the accused vide orders dated 07.07.2023 and 17.07.2023 (Annexures P-4 to P- 6). 2. In compliance to the order dated 10.03.2025, counsel for respondents No.2 to 5 has voluntarily handed over their original affidavits menoning their assets, one copy to the peoner and one copy to the State. There is no need for this Court to keep any copy because declaraon of assets will not have bearing on the outcome. 3. Given such declaraon, this Court does not deem it appropriate to proceed further. 4. Peoner is at liberty to proceed against those accused who have concealed their assets or violated the terms of order whereby bail was granted. 5. It shall be permissible for the complainant to file an applicaon for cancellaon before the trial Court including the Court of judicial Magistrate which shall be competent to cancel the bail granted by this Court. It is for the reason that offences involved are under Secon 420 IPC which is triable by Magistrate. Once it is legal to say that the law is se:led that the case which is triable by the Magistrate, in such cases, all the Magistrates are competent to grant or cancel bail in case, authorized to do so or in case violaon by the accused. 6. Given above, the present peon is disposed of. Pending applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. 14.05.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.05.21 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document