PRADEEP SAHU @ PRADEEP KUMAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4776/2025 · 2025-08-26
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23181 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23181 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:25417
1 A.B.A. No. 4776 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
----
A.B.A. No. 4776 of 2025
---- Pradeep Sahu @ Pradeep Kumar Sahu aged about 33 years son of late Moti Lal Sahu resident of Dipatoli Pundag PO Pundag PS Jagarnathpur District Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner
:- Mr. Karan Kaushik , Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Rakesh Kr Sinha, Advocate
----
2/26.08.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.199 of 2025, for offence registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ranchi.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is land dispute between the parties and the petitioner is son of raiyati land owner upon which illegal encroachment has been done by the land brokers including the informant of this case wherein in the year 2018 one Original Suit has been filed by the petitioner being Original Suit No.571 of 2018 which has been
decreed in favour of the petitioner. He submits that there are several cases due to that litigation and there is general and omnibus allegation of assault. He submits that injury is there, however, it is not clear as to upon whose blow such injury is received by the informant.
4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that injury is
2025:JHHC:25417
2 A.B.A. No. 4776 of 2025
grievous in nature.
5. Considering that altercation took place due to land dispute and for that one Original Suit has also been instituted by the petitioner which has been later decreed in favour of the petitioner and from the FIR it has not transpired that by whose blow such injury has been received by the informant and there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner.
6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ranchi, in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.199 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/