Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2318 (HP)

MOHINDER SINGH AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/20971/2025 · 2026-01-02

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.20971 of 2025 Decided on 02nd January 2026 Mohinder Singh and another …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ankit Dhiman, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5. 2. In light of the order that the Court proposes to pass in the petition, no notice is being issued to respondent No.6, as no order adverse to the interest of respondent No.6 is being passed. 2 3. The grievance of the petitioners, who claim themselves to be the member of respondent No.6 Committee is that despite the expiry of the term of the elected members of the Committee of respondent No.6, no fresh elections are being conducted. 4. Without making any observation on the issues raised in the writ petition, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioners shall approach the Registrar concerned afresh on this particular issue of election by way of representation within two weeks from today and appropriate call shall be taken thereupon by the Registrar concerned within four weeks as from the date of the receipt of the representation after adhering the principles of natural justice. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 02, 2026 (Vinod)