1 WPC No. 2621 of 2025 2025:CGHC:22284 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2621 of 2025 1 - Bhagwan Prasad Yadav S/o Nilkanth Yadav Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Radhabai Gupta W/o Ramkumar Gupta Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Anand Ram Patel S/o Dhaniram Patel Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - Manbodh Prasad Sahu S/o Radheshyam Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 5 - Salik Ram Gupta S/o Janak Ram Gupta Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 6 - Jai Patel S/o Paras Ram Patel Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2025.05.22 16:40:27 +0530 2 WPC No. 2621 of 2025 Bhatapara (C.G.) 7 - Pramod Kumar Sahu S/o Chandulal Sahu Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 8 - Kewal Ram Verma S/o Sundar Lal Verma Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 9 - Khagesh Kumar Sahu S/o Bhupendra Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Tundra, Tahsil- Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Tundra District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - Nagar Panchayat Tundra Through- Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Tundra, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. 3 WPC No. 2621 of 2025 SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 22.05 .2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners stand redressed. 2. In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. However, it is made clear that liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to approach this Court again, if any further cause of action subsists. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arpan