Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23173 (AP)

T.M. GOMATHI v. A. MEENAKUMARI @ MEENAKSHI

CRP/1549/2025 · 2025-09-03

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010326082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1549/2025 Between: 1. T.M. GOMATHI, W/O. LATE T.N MASTHAN BABU @ GANESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO 6/6 BABU AGRAHARAM, SRIKALAHASTI. 2. T.M.RUPESH,, S/O. LATE T.N.MASTHAN BABU @ GANESH, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.6/6 BABU AGRAHARAM, SRIKALAHASTI. 3. T M BALAJI,, S/O. LATE T.N MASTHAN BABU @ GANESH AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, MJNOR REP. BY ITS MOTHER/GUARDIAN 1ST PETITIONER T.M. GOMATHI, W/O. LATE T.N MASTHANBABU @ GANESH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/O. DOOR NO 6/6 BABU AGRAHARAM, SRIKALAHASTI. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. A MEENAKUMARI MEENAKSHI, W/o late Aged about 55 years, R/o. Door No 11 Bahadurpeta, Srikalahast ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Y MAHA LAKSHMI 2 Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SHAIK AFZAL MOHAMMED The Court made the following Order: 3 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause survives in this revision petition. 2. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 04.09.2025 PGT