APHC010326622020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 21647/2020 Between: 1. MARPU DEENARAJU, S/O.GABRIYEL, AGED 32 YEARS, CASTE- SCHEDULED CASTE, R/O. TOTAVARIPALE, CHIRALA MD, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DIST. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIRALA RURAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no 3 in not proceeding for any enquiry on the SPANDANA Report lodged by the petitioner vide its No.1130/2016 dated 26.09.2019 despite the dame is endorsed by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent to conduct enquiry as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no 3 to expedite the enquiry and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no 3 in not proceeding for any enquiry on the SPANDANA Report lodged by the petitioner vide its No.1130/2016 dated 26.09.2019 despite the dame is endorsed by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent to conduct enquiry as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14,19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no 3 to expedite the enquiry and pass ...” Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that Petitioner made a petition dated 26.09.2020 to respondent No.2 in SPANDANA GRIEVANCE CELL requesting to take action against respondent No.4. During enquiry, detailed statement of the Petitioner was recorded. Further, case and counter cases were registered against the Petitioner as well as Sri Salagala Jeevaratnam and others and the cases under investigation and accordingly enquiry report is submitted to the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Chirala Division. There is no iota of truth in the allegations made by the Petitioner in his SPANDA PETITION and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21647 11711 of 2020 04.09.2025 Mjl /*