Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23163 (AP)

Sadu Venkata Akshay v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6690/2025 · 2025-09-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010326132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6690 OF 2025 Between: 1. SADU VENKATA AKSHAY, S/O. SADU NARASIMHULU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. F2, MALLIKA ENCLAVE, CSN REDDY COLONY, NEAR NEELIMA NURSERY ROAD TADEPALLI, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATI THROUGH SHO, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT 2. MUGGALLA CHANDRIKA, D/O. MUGGALLA VENU GOPALA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.11A, KK RAJA GREEN CITY, MINI BY PASS ROAD, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING NEAR CHAITANYA COLLEGE, OPP. MANA MESS NEAR PIE ELECTRONICS, BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 16.07.2025 IN I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 IN CRL.P.NO.6690 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the Petitionersubmitted that the Criminal Petition has become infructuous, as the parties have been compromised in the matter. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 23.09.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6690 OF 2025 23.09.2025 KK