Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23161 (GAU)

SMTI. TEMSURENLA LONGCHAR v. SHRI C. MANGYANG JAMIR

C. REVN/2/2025 · 2025-07-16

Shamima Jahan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020002322025 2025:GAU-NL:301 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : C. REVN/2/2025 SMTI. TEMSURENLA LONGCHAR D/O SHRI IMNA LONGCHAR, R/O H.NO. FD-20, FOREST DEPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, FOREST COLONY, DIMAPUR NAGALAND-797112 VERSUS SHRI C. MANGYANG JAMIR S/O SHRI I. CHUBA JAMIR, R/O H.NO. 168, NAHARBARI, DIMAPUR- 797112, NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : C. T. JAMIR, SR. ADV, O TEMJEN JAMIR,JAWAMONG YADEN,IMTILA PONGEN,NUNGSANG AIER,KROVI TSUKRU,TOSHI JAMIR,ASA RUTSA,ALIBA OZUKUM,I IMCHEN Advocate for the Respondent : SENTIYANGER, BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 17.07.2025 Heard Ms. Jawamong Yaden, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the respondent. The counsel appearing for Page No.# 2/3 the petitioner has placed a Judgment dated 19.06.2025 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dimapur, Nagaland by which, the Custody Case No. 7/2023 was disposed of by virtue of a settlement arrived between the parties i.e., the mother and the father of the three (3) children. The operative part of the said Judgment is reproduced below:- “I have examined the parties generally and found that both parties have clearly understood the terms and conditions of the agreement. In this regard, the mother/second party has expressed her apprehension regarding third party interference. It is made clear to both the parties that as the father and mother they are the primary guardians and their agreement dated 19.06.2025 concern the welfare of their 3 (three) children. Therefore, both parties shall endeavor to make sure that the custody agreement that they have arrived at this time is honored and complied with trust and open communication. Thus, upon satisfaction as to the veracity of the agreement arrived at between the parties dated 19.06.2025, and that there is no collusion or coercion in the execution of the agreement, this I.A (Civil) 59/2025 stands allowed and Custody case No. 07/2023 stands disposed as settled along with I.A (Civil) case no. 59/2025. Furnish copy of the order to both parties.” 2. The instant application i.e., C.REVN No. 2/2025 has been filed against an Order dated 19.12.2024 by which an interim custody of the children was allowed to the father i.e., the sole respondent. However, during the pendency of the same, the parties have entered into a settlement to the effect that the custody of all the three (3) children is handed over to the father till they attain majority and that the mother was allowed to have custody of the Page No.# 3/3 children on alternate weekends, every month and also to have custody on consecutive weekends. 3. On the said agreement being reached between the parties, the main Custody Case No. 7/2023 was disposed of vide order dated 19.06.2025 as stated above. The counsels appearing for both the parties have stated that in view of the said order, the present case may also be closed since the same has become infructuous. 4. It is noticed that for the welfare of the three (3) children, the parties have entered into an agreement and the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Dimapur, Nagaland has also directed both the parties to adhere strictly to the agreement and to execute the same without any interference from any third party. In view of the order passed in Custody Case No. 7/2023 dated 19.06.2025, this petition stands closed. 5. Petition is disposed of. The Caveat also stands discharged. JUDGE Comparing Assistant