1 2025:CGHC:8044 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3779 of 2023 1 - Laxman Kumeti S/o Late Shri Sevaram Kumeti, Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Inspector In Police Line, Narayanpur, District - Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh, R/o Sector - 4, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police (D.G.P.), Police Head Quarter (P.H.Q.), Near Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Inspector General Of Police (I.G.P.) Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Senior Superintendent Of Police (S.S.P.), Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Shriya Daga, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Kawaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.02.17 19:29:45 +0530 2 14/02/2025 1. Heard Ms. Shriya Daga, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Kawaljeet Singh Saini, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition in a departmental enquiry has been completed and final order is not passed, therefore he is seeking withdrawal of this petition with a liberty to approach to respondents to decide the case of the petitioner directly in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) vs Pankaj Chaudhary) reported in (2019) 11 SCC 575 and also in the matter of W.P.(CR) No. 544/2020 Laxman Kumeti vs. State of Chhattisgarh. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel would not oppose the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. As such, also heard on I.A. No.2, which is an application for withdrawal of writ petition and same is allowed for the reasons mentioned in the application. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the extent as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi