APHC010326322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16265/2025 Between: 1. DR. A. SATYAVANI, , W/Q KRISHNAIAH, R/O- 2-14-119/1, A LINE, SYAMALA NAGAR, SRI VEFIKATESHWARA BALAKUTEER PATTABHIPURARRI, GUNTUR - 522006ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HCM, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN- 522 238. 2. DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, NTR VETERINARY SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL PREMISES LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA- 520010 3. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR AIF, DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, NTR VETERINARY SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL PREMISES LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA-520010 4. JOINT DIRECTOR AH, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY TIRUPATI DIST. 5. DR BVENKATESWARLU NAIK, S/O -NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGE - NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (AH), AVH, GUNTAKAL ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus setting aside the impugned order, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unfair, improper, bias, grudge, oblique, improper motive for ulterior purpose mala fide and amounting to unfair practices and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to retain the Petitioner in the previous location at the Office of managing Director, APSGDCF ltd, Guntur and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TAGORE YADAV YARAGORLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Writ Petition No.16265 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:09.07.2025. cs