ASHOK KUMAR S/O SANWALRAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/110/2025 · 2025-01-10
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2315 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2315 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1656] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 110/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Sanwalram Meena, Resident of Gordha, Police Station Sawar, District Kekri ( Rajasthan). ( Power Of Attorney Holder Of Owner Of Mahindra Pickup Registration No. Rj-14-Ge- 8346). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nonit Hatila for Mr. Vishal Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 10/01/2025
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNS, 2023 against the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by District Collector Kekri in Application No.151/2024 titled as Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan for release of vehicle No. RJ-14-GE-8346, which has been allowed while imposing conditions.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the vehicle of the petitioner was seized on 18.09.2023 at Police Station Sawar, District Kekri since then the vehicle is lying idle and being deteriorated day by day.
3. The petitioner is the power of attorney holder and the registered owner of the vehicle. Vide impugned order, the District Collector, Kekri has ordered for release of the vehicle subject to
[2025:RJ-JP:1656] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-110/2025] other conditions including pre-deposit of the amount of vehicle as mentioned in the insurance certificate of the vehicle.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a poor person and the vehicle is of his personal use, therefore, the condition of deposition of the amount equal to the value of the vehicle be quashed.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made by
learned counsel for the respondent.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 28.11.2024 passed by District Collector, Kekri requires modification, therefore, the same is modified and the amount of fine equal to the value of the vehicle imposed in the impugned order is waived. Rest part of the order dated 28.11.2024 shall remain same.
7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /57