Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23149 (RAJ)

MOHAMMED IMRAN AND ANR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLMP/4996/2016 · 2025-08-19

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4996/2016 1. Mohammed Imran aged about 30 years, S/o Mohammed Hakim, R/o House No.2348, Mohalla Neelgaran, Ramganj Bajar, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Shain Bano aged about 21 years W/o Mohammed Imran D/o Mumtaz Ahmed, R/o House No.73, behind Shem Ki Badi, Jaisingh Nagar, Manbagh Dehli Bypass, Jaipur, presently residing in House No.2348, Mohalla Neelgaran, Ramganj Bajar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Commissioner, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Ramganj, Jaipur. 4. Mumtaj Ahmed S/o Shri Anwar Ahmed, R/o 73, Shamin Ki Badi Ke Pichhe, Jai Singh Nagar, Maan Bagh, Jaipur. 5. Smt. Mubin Bano W/o Mumtaj Ahmed R/o 73, Shamim Ki Badi Ke Pichhe, Jai Singh Nagar, Maan Bagh, Jaipur. 6. Mohammed Shafik S/o Mumtaj Ahmed S/o Shri Anwar Ahmed, R/o 73, Shamin Ki Badi Ke Pichhe, Jai Singh Nagar, Maan Bagh, Jaipur. 7. Najar Ahmed S/o Shri Anar Ahmed, R/o 278, Bandri Ka Nasik, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Namo Narayan Meena, Adv. for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. Mr. Anoop Agarwal, Adv. for respondent No.6 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 19/08/2025 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for providing police protection to the petitioners and family of petitioner No.1 from the respondent Nos. 4 to 7. [2025:RJ-JP:32400] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4996/2016] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners solemnized their marriage way back in the year 2016 and have been living a peaceful married life. 3. The petitioners were provided interim police protection by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. This Petition is pending since the year 2016. 4. Nothing has been reported till date and so far no incident has been caused with the petitioners, therefore, by lapse of time, the petition seems to have become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 6. Stay application and all other pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. 7. Petitioners may apply a fresh protection order, if needs so arises. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /26