Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23149 (HP)

RAJ KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF HP AND ANR

CWP/13358/2025 · 2025-08-20

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13358 of 2025 Decided on: 20th August, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raj Kumar Gupta …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Prashant Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, respectively. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred representations dated 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 15.09.2022 and 20.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case respondent No.2/ competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representations within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents are not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 20, 2025 Judge Mukesh