APHC010326062020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21628/2020 Between: 1. ANNAPUREDDY MANJU VANI, W/O ANNAPUREDDY MOHAN REDDY, AGE 68 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.6-14-7, 14/3 LANE, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, HOME DEPORTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AT GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. VALAPARLA UDAYA KUMAR, S/O. LATE JASHUVA, AGE 45 YEARS R/O. D.NO.6-14-8, 14/3 LANE, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 6. VALAPARLA RAVI KUMAR, S/O. LATE JASHUVA, AGE 45 YEARS R/O. D.NO.6-14-8, 14/3 LANE, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21628 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking necessary action against the 5th and 6th respondents basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 28-09-2020 by providing protection to the petitioner and her property, as illegal and arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to take necessary action against the 5th and 6th respondents basing on the report of the petitioner, dated 28-09-2020 by providing protection to the petitioner and her property, and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 01.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21628 of 2020 Dated.01.09.2025 UPS 07