[2025:JHHC:25871] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4911 of 2025 Jyoti Bai @ Jamotry Bye Karsh, aged about 63 Years, Wife of Babulal Baidh @ Babulal Karsh, Resident of Village- Nawagarh, P.O. & P.S.- Nawagarh, Distt.- Janjgir- Champa (Chhatisgarh). ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Jaiswal, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 28.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 653 of 2022, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the informant has been terminated from the service of the CCL and the said termination order has been challenged before this court in W.P.(S) No. 7094 of 2017. He submits that in that case, the petitioner has filed a petition for arraying him as intervenor on the ground that on the forged documents, the informant has got the appointment and that writ petition is still pending. He further submits that on these backgrounds, the present FIR has been lodged against the petitioner alleging that he has forged the documents in connivance with accused No. 2 and the said accused No. 2 has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 2305 of 2023 by the co-ordinate bench of this court. [2025:JHHC:25871] -2- 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of preparing forged documents. 5. Considering that the petitioner has become intervenor in W.P.(S) No. 7094 of 2017 and it has been alleged that the informant has been appointed on the basis of forged documents and further the other co-accused has already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 2305 of 2023 by the co-ordinate bench of this court, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 653 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-