Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23144 (JHR)

UMESHWAR PRASAD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/899/2024 · 2025-07-04

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17922 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 899 of 2024 --------- Umeshwar Prasad Singh, son of late Jageshwar Prasad Singh, resident of PHED Colony, Road No. 24, near Panch Mandir, Patratu Thermal Power Station, P.O. & P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh ……. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Secretary, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Secretariat, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, PIN-834002. ……. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Bakshi Vibha, Advocate Ms. Chetna Nandini, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kishore Kumar Singh, SC-V ------ 06/04.07.2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the opposite party-State submits that the order of the Court has been complied and compliance report is ready to be filed. The said compliance report/ show-cause is taken on record. 2. From the averments and the documents annexed with the show-cause, it appears that the order has been complied. 3. Accordingly, the instant application stands disposed of. 4. It goes without saying that if the petitioner is aggrieved by any of the calculations, then he may approach the concerned opposite party, if so advised. 5. The personal appearance of the opposite party No. 2 is dispensed with. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal