APHC010326792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16639/2025 Between: 1. MOHAMMADGARI NAYEEM, S/O YUSUB, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC FRUIT BUSINESS, R/O H. NO. 1-61, DEGALAPETA, SIRIVELLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SIRIVELLA POLICE STATION, SIRIVELLA, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. CHINNA PEERAIAH YADAV, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIRIVELLA POLICE STATION, SIRIVELLA, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. MOHAMMADGARI KOUSAR, , W/O NAYEEM, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O SIRIVELLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2 Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in demanding and exerting pressure on the petitioner to settle the family dispute with the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interference with the personal liberty of the petitioner and not to interfere with the family dispute pending between the petitioner and 5th respondent in the interest of justice pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 3 & 4 not to call the petitioner to Police Station and not to interfere with the family dispute pending between the petitioner and 5th respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Nos.3 and 4 at the behest of respondent No.5 are interfering in family dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.5. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that after the registration of Crime No. 44 of 2025 against the petitioner, the police called the petitioner to the police station for the purpose of enquiry and issued a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 08.07.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N 79 WRIT PETITION NO: 16826/2025 Date: 08.07.2025 MH