IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10118 of 2023 Decided on: 16th September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kalpeshwari …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Respondents have filed reply to the petition opposing the relief of conferring of work charge status claimed by the petitioner from the respondent-Controller, Printing and Stationery Department. 2. In view of reply filed by the respondents, giving details of petitioner’s previous engagement in the then H.P. Housing Board, which has not been impleaded in the writ petition even though the relief as claimed makes the said organization as a necessary party, learned vice counsel 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law with proper parties and appropriate pleadings. Prayer is accepted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 16, 2025 Judge Mukesh