Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23139 (GAU)

SHRI CHOTRISE L. SANGTAM v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/43/2025 · 2025-07-23

Yarenjungla Longkumer

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020001552025 2025:GAU-NL:331 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/43/2025 SHRI CHOTRISE L. SANGTAM S/O LENNY S. R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE DIRECTOR DEPT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RD BLOCK KIPHIRE NAGALAND 5:SHRI THINKLI K SANGTAM MULTI TASK STAFF UNDER THE ESTB. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RD BLOCK KIPOHIRE NAGALAN Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : TOSHITEMJEN PONGENER, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Linked Case : WP(C)/269/2023 SHRI CHOTRISE L SANGTAM S/O LENNY S R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER R D BLOCK KIPHIRE NAGALAND 5:SHRI THINKLI K SANGTAM MULTI TASK STAFF UNDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RD. BLOCK KIPHIRE NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : TOSHITEMJEN PONGENER Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER O R D E R 24.07.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant, Mr. Toshitemjen Pongener has prayed for withdrawal of the present I.A. as there are some errors in the same and he prays for liberty to file afresh. Prayer is allowed. The learned counsel for the applicant is allowed to withdraw the I.A. with liberty to file afresh. In view of the long pendency of the connected writ petition, the petitioner shall file the same within a period of one week. JUDGE Comparing Assistant