RAJEEV JAITHLIYA S/O SHRI DHANRAJ JAITHLIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9990/2025 · 2025-07-12
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23132 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23132 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9990/2025 Rajeev Jaithliya S/o Shri Dhanraj Jaithliya, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 48, Indra Nagar, Madanganj, Ward No. 37, Kishangarh, Ajmer Presently Working On The Post Of Pharmacist At District Hospital Kishangarh, District Ajmer ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur
3. Director,
(Non-Gazetted),
Medical
And
Health Department, Directorate, Jaipur
4. Hariom Khanduja, Pharmacist Grade-I, Presently Working At Phc Bajawas Ahiran Kotputli-Behror
5. Ashok Choudhary, Pharmacist Grade-I, Presently Working At District Hospital, Kishangarh, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 12/07/2025
1. By way of instant writ petition, petitioner has impugned the
order dated 06.06.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Authority, dismissing petitioner's appeal alongwith other appeals, involving identical ground to assail the transfer of Pharmacists, vide order/ list dated 23.04.2025. Petitioner has been transferred from Kishangarh to Nasirabad.
2. It appears that petitioner was promoted from the post of Pharmacist to Pharmacist Gr. I and after according promotion, he
[2025:RJ-JP:25949] (2 of 2) [CW-9990/2025] has been given posting at Nasirabad. The transfer order has been passed for administrative reasons and there are no mala fides.
3. In view of above, counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition on merits and seeks permission to submit a representation before the respondents to reconsider his transfer
order.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press with liberty prayed for.
5. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/5