Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30158 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6325 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ismail Respondent :- Additional Commissioner Judicial And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ayub Khan,Syed Nadeem Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "A ) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated: 11.11.2024 passed by learned Additional Commissioner Judicial, (IInd), Varanasi Division, Varanasi/respondent no.-01 in Revision No.-12/ 2007-2008, Computerize Case no.-C20081400001086 (Noor Mohammad vs. Alauddin) Under Section 219 of Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act 1901 and order dated: 04.09.2008 passed by learned Tehsildar (Judicial), Mohammadabad, District: Ghazipur in Case No.-380 Under Section 34 of Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act (Alauddin vs. Noor Mohammad) vide (Annexure-01 & 02 to the writ petition)." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that father of the petitioner wanted to execute an agreement to sell wherein the respondent has obtained the forged sale deed. The mutation application filed by the respondent has been allowed and the restoration application as well as revision filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. It has been further contended by counsel for the petitioner that the suit for cancellation of sale deed is pending. 4. Since the sale deed executed in favour of the respondent has not been cancelled, no illegality has been committed by the courts below in passing the order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 4.3.2025/Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad