Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020001162024 2025:GAU-NL:37 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/37/2024 SHRI YONGTHA W/C LABOUR (FIXED) EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION LONGLENG NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND P AND AR DEPT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION LONGLENG NAGALAND Page No.# 2/3 7:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION LONGLENG NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : LIMANARO, KEKHRIESENUO,H ZELIANG Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Linked Case : WP(C)/39/2024 SMTI TANGPE PHOM AND 2 ORS W/C LABOUR (FIXED) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT(HOUSING) TUENSANG DIVISION NAGALAND 2: SHRI L. MOBACHINGMAK PHOM W/C LABOUR (FIXED) PWD(HOUSING) TUENSANG DIVISION NAGALAND 3: SHRI PONGI PHOM@PONGOI PHOM W/C SECTIONAL ASSISTANT PWD(HOUSING) TUENSANG NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND P AND AR DEPT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY WORKS AND HOUSING NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF Page No.# 3/3 NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (HOUSING) TUENSANG DIVISION TUENSANG NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : LIMANARO Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA ORDER 17.02.2025 Heard Ms. Kekhriesenuo, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N. Angami, learned Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents. Ms. Kekhriesenuo, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the relief sought for in the writ petitions has been redressed. She, therefore, has instructions from the petitioners not to pursue the petition. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, no further cause of action survives in the case. Both the writ petitions accordingly stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant