Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23121 (BOM)

VRUSHALI UTTAMRAO DUDHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/10186/2018 · 2025-03-18

Shri Ravindra V Ghuge

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - wp13513.19.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 13513 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11939 OF 2021 IN WP/13513/2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10186 OF 2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10187 OF 2018 Dayanand Sambhajirao Manjramkar & others ….Petitioners VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others …..Respondents ….. Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for the State. Mr. S. G. Karlekar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. DATE : 18th MARCH, 2025. PER COURT : 1. Writ Petition Nos. 10186/2018 and 10187/2018 are not on board. Taken on board at the request of the learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. We have heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides. - 2 - wp13513.19.odt 3. Mr. Karlekar, learned counsel representing Respondent No. 2 submits that a compliance report has already been tendered before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the light of the order dated 10.05.2018, passed in Civil Appeal No. 5700/2018 (Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9889/2018). 4. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that since a compliance report has been tendered to the Hon’ble Supreme Court, he would avail of a remedy as is permissible. 5. In view of the above statement, all the Petitions are disposed off, on instructions. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) ( CHIEF JUSTICE ) dyb