Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23118 (AP)

MOHAMMED SIDDIK v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16685/2025 · 2025-07-06

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010325932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY.THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16685 OF 2025 Between: Mohammed Siddik, S/o. Late M. Abdul Gaffoor, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Door No. 10-744, Trunk Road, Varadaiahpalem Village and Mandal, Chittoor, Chittoor District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Tfie Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State Mangalagiri, Guntur District Office at 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi District at Tirupathi. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Sathyavedu Circle, Tirupathi District. 5. The Station House Officer, Varadaiahpalem P.S, Tirupathi District. 6. Aarani Vidyanadha Reddy, S/o. Not Known, Age Not Known, Occ; Not R/o. Buchinaidu Kandriga Village and Mandal, Tirupathi known. District. 7. T Vineethkumar Reddy, S/o. Surendrakumar Reddy, Aged about 26 years, Occ: Petrol Bunk, R/o. West Warathuru, Buchinaidu Kandriga Mandal, Tirupathi District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking further steps in registering the F.I.R on the petitioner's complaint Dt.28.10.2024 inspite of repeated requests, though it is a cognizable offence, as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the Judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and consequently direct the Respondents, to register the F.I.R on the petitioners complaint Dt.28.10.2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondents, to take action by registering the F.I.R, on the petitioner’s complaint Dt. 28.10.2024, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010325932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] 0% MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16685/2025 Between: 1.MOHAMMED SIDDIK, S/0 LATE M. ABDUL GAFFOOR ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/0 DOOR NO. 10-744, TRUNK ROAD. VARADAIAHPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AGED ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, OFFICE AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATHI 4.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATHYAVEDU CIRCLE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VARADAIAHPALEM P.S, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT 6.AARANI VIDYANADHA REDDY, S/0 NOT KNOWN KNOWN, OCC NOT KNOWN, VILLAGE AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT AGE NOT R/0 BUCHINAIDU KANDRIGA 7.T VINEETHKUMAR REDDY, S/0 SURENDRAKUMAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC PETROL BUNK. R/0 WEST WARATHURU buchinaidu kandriga mandal, tirupathi district ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.16685 of 2025 ORDER: - Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved 1. by the inaction on part of the respondent/ police in registering a complaint in pursuance of the representation dated 28.10.2024. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions submits that the 2. police have registered the crime vide Cr.124 of 2021 under sections 417, 420 and 506 IPC and after conducting enquiry and recording statements of five witnesses have referred the same as civil in nature. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is closed leaving it open for 3. the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law, if so, aggrieved with the final report by the police. Thdre shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. section officer //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Advocate [opuc] / : 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. AL •\ s HIGH COURT \ DATED:07/07/2025 i ■) ORDER WP NO. 16685 OF 2025 s- ■ ■' 'i 0 5 AUG 2025 jgj nt Section^ o " \. j CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS