Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23110 (JHR)

GAJENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/3821/2022 · 2025-03-05

Deepak Roshan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1 of 2- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 3821 of 2022 Gajendra Kumar, Aged About-41 Years, Son of Kanhai Ram, Resident of Parasi, Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S.- Ichak, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand-825402 ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. 2. The Commissioner, North Chhota Nagpur Division, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh, State- Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh, State- Jharkhand. 4. The Additional Collector (Land Revenue), Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh, State- Jharkhand. 5. The Circle Officer, Ichak having its office at Ichak Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh, State- Jharkhand. 6. The Archeological Survey of India, through its Zonal Director having its office at PP Compound, P.O. & P.S.- Hindpiri, District-Ranchi, State - Jharkhand … … ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Deen Bandhu, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Harsh Chandra, Advocate Mr. Shashank Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, G.A.-I Mr. Chandan Tiwari, A.C. to G.A.-I For the Intervener: Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate Ms. Kumari Ranjana Singh, Advocate --------- 15/Dated: 05.03.2025 I.A. No. 7526 of 2024 Since no reason is assigned by the applicant herein for impleading the proposed party as a party in the Writ Petition, this application is dismissed. I.A. No. 12917 of 2024 This application is filed by the applicant to implead a party as respondent in this case alleging that he is an encroacher but without -2 of 2- filing any document in support of his pleading that he is an encroacher. Therefore, this application is dismissed. W.P. (PIL) No. 3821 of 2022 Since no other person is proposed to be impleaded on the ground that they are grabbing Government land, this W.P.(PIL) is dismissed. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, stands disposed of. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) APK/VK