Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23109 (KAR)

BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI v. MR SRIRAJ AHAMED

WP/12699/2020 · 2025-01-15

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1510 WP No. 12699 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 12699 OF 2020 (GM-PP) BETWEEN: BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI (BANKI MASJID), DODDAPET, BEHIND VEGETABLE MARKET, KOLAR-563 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SWATHI ASHOK., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MR.SRIRAJ AHAMED S/O. MOHAMMED JAMAL SAB, AGED 57 YEARS, SHOP NO.21, BADRUDDIN MOSQUE SUNNI (BANK MASJID), DODDAPET, BEHIND VEGETABLE MARKET, KOLAR-563 101. 2. THE COMPETENT OFFICER/ UNDER THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC PREMISES, (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1974 AND ADDL. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DARUL AWAQAF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU-560 052. …RESPONDENTS (R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1510 WP No. 12699 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 14