Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23101 (JHR)

RITESH KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5444/2024 · 2025-04-29

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12774 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5444 of 2024 1. Ritesh Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Pran Kumar Singh 2. Aryan Singh @ Aryan Kumar Singh, S/o Ramesh Kumar Singh 3. Samarjit Singh @ Samarjeet Singh, S/o Ram Awatar Singh 4. Manjit Kumar Singh @ Manjeet Singh @ Monu S/o Sri Ramautar Singh 5. Prithvi Raj Singh, S/o Ramautar Singh, All R/o Niche Tola, Gorawali, PO and PS Balidih, District Bokaro (Jharkhand) ….. Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Raksh Kumar Sinha, APP ----- 03/29.04.2025: This anticipatory bail application has have been filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners have been allegedly implicated in connection with Balidih PS case no. 166 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under sections 147,148, 149, 341,33,324,325, 307,379,504 and 506 of the IPC, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. 3. The learned APP opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 4. As per allegations the informant was preparing challan of vehicle then the petitioners came and started assaulting him with intention to kill him, as a result of which, he sustained grievous injuries. 5. After going through the records I find that that that the petitioners have assaulted the informant. Thus, I do not find this case fit for grant of anticipatory bail. 6. Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/