[2025:RJ-JP:30087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8467/2025 Bhajan Lal S/o Failiram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Bandhawal, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Shivam for Mr. Harendra Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.70/2025 registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 351(2) & 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross- cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submits that dispute between the parties has been resolved amicably. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:30087] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8467/2025] 10.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that offence punishable under Section 109 of BNS (corresponding to Section 307 of IPC) has been found proved against the petitioner which is not compoundable. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and submits that complainant has no objection if the present bail application is accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Bhajan Lal S/o Failiram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to [2025:RJ-JP:30087] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8467/2025] which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN ), J LALIT MOHAN /207