FATMA BANOO v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/2191/2012 · 2025-02-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2310 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2310 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP No. 2191/2012
Fatma Banoo
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.02.2025
The instant petition has come up for hearing before this Court after 11 years and during this intervening period, no effort was made on part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed.
Today, when the case was taken up, it has been brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the respondents, that the instant petition with the efflux of time has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. However, petitioner will be at liberty to revive the same in case, fresh cause of action is accrued.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 03.02.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 45 Mihul Singh 2025.02.05 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document